Equality Project
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Project
    • Our Research Team
    • Our Partners
    • Our Students
    • Our Youth Advisory Committee
    • eQuality Annual Reports
  • Research
    • Research Projects
    • Research Publications
    • Conference Presentations
  • Policy
    • Policy Interventions
    • Policy Publications
  • Resources
    • Youth Summit
      • eQuality Project Youth Summit Documentary
    • Outreach Projects
    • Art Exchange
    • Cashing In: The Invisible Machine
    • CRM 1300 – Cybercrime & Surveillance
    • Disconnection Challenge
    • Connection Challenge
    • Half Girl, Half Face
    • International Day of the Girl
    • Legal Briefs: Tech-Facilitated Violence & the Law
    • Panel on AI & Algorithms
    • Pushback Timeline
    • Tech-Facilitated Violence – Criminal Case Law
    • #tresdancing
    • Transcending Technology – Between Freedom and Surveillance
    • unLine Exhibition
    • UROP & Student Posters
    • You Are What We Make You
    • Youth Speakers List
    • eQuality Lesson Plans
  • Follow Us
    • Twitter
    • eQuality News
    • eQuality Blog
    • Youth Speakers List
×
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Project
    • Our Research Team
    • Our Partners
    • Our Students
    • Our Youth Advisory Committee
    • eQuality Annual Reports
  • Research
    • Research Projects
    • Research Publications
    • Conference Presentations
  • Policy
    • Policy Interventions
    • Policy Publications
  • Resources
    • Youth Summit
      • eQuality Project Youth Summit Documentary
    • Outreach Projects
    • Art Exchange
    • Cashing In: The Invisible Machine
    • CRM 1300 – Cybercrime & Surveillance
    • Disconnection Challenge
    • Connection Challenge
    • Half Girl, Half Face
    • International Day of the Girl
    • Legal Briefs: Tech-Facilitated Violence & the Law
    • Panel on AI & Algorithms
    • Pushback Timeline
    • Tech-Facilitated Violence – Criminal Case Law
    • #tresdancing
    • Transcending Technology – Between Freedom and Surveillance
    • unLine Exhibition
    • UROP & Student Posters
    • You Are What We Make You
    • Youth Speakers List
    • eQuality Lesson Plans
  • Follow Us
    • Twitter
    • eQuality News
    • eQuality Blog
    • Youth Speakers List
×

Tech-Facilitated Violence – Criminal Case Law – Sexual Exploitation

Home / Resources / Tech-Facilitated Violence – Criminal Case Law / Tech-Facilitated Violence: Criminal Case Law – Criminal Offences / Tech-Facilitated Violence – Criminal Case Law – Sexual Exploitation

OFFENCE ELEMENTS - SEXUAL EXPLOITATION

153(1)

Every person commits an offence who is in a position of trust or authority towards a young person, who is a person with whom the young person is in a relationship of dependency or who is in a relationship with a young person that is exploitative of the young person, and who,

(a) for a sexual purpose, touches, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, any part of the body of the young person; or

(b) for a sexual purpose, invites, counsels or incites a young person to touch, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, the body of any person, including the body of the person who so invites, counsels or incites and the body of the young person.

(1.1) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1)

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of forty-five days; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of fourteen days.

(1.2) A judge may infer that a person is in a relationship with a young person that is exploitative of the young person from the nature and circumstances of the relationship, including

(a) the age of the young person;

(b) the age difference between the person and the young person;

(c) the evolution of the relationship; and

(d) the degree of control or influence by the person over the young person.

SELECTED CASE LAW

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

ALBERTA:
2017 ABQB 357
2016 ABPC 285
2016 ABCA 194
2016 ABCA 75
2013 ABQB 546
2016 ABCA 75
2015 ABCA 149
2013 ABCA 188
2013 ABCA 79

BRITISH COLUMBIA:
2018 BCCA 339
2018 BCCA 81
2018 BCCA 30
2017 BCCA 354
2017 BCPC 265
2017 BCSC 192
2016 BCPC 150
2016 BCCA 86
2015 BCSC 2055
2011 BCSC 1833
2009 BCSC 1514
2003 BCCA 47
2001 BCCA 462

MANITOBA:
2015 MBQB 96

NEW BRUNSWICK:
2017 NBQB 60
2015 NBCA 10
2014 NBCA 71
1999 CarswellNB 528

NOVA SCOTIA:
2018 NSCA 18
2011 NSCA 77
2004 NSCA 154

ONTARIO:
2018 ONSC 2922
2017 ONCJ 906
2017 ONCJ 733
2017 ONSC 207
2017 ONSC 2625
2016 ONSC 6861
2016 ONCJ 605
2016 ONCJ 264
2016 ONSC 3341
2015 ONCA 927
2014 ONSC 1472

PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND:
2018 PESC 7
2009 PECA 4

QUEBEC:
2017 QCCQ 318
2016 QCCQ 7139
2013 QCCQ 13361

SASKATCHEWAN
2017 SKQB 185
2014 SKCA 126
2012 SKCA 74
2012 SKCA 18

Contact

The eQuality Project
University of Ottawa, Brooks 410,
100 Thomas More Private
Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
CANADA

E-Mail: info@equalityproject.ca
Website: equalityproject.ca
Twitter: @eQuality_ca

About

The eQuality Project is funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

SSHRC Logo

Icons made by Elegant Themes from www.flaticon.com are licensed as CC BY 3.0

Powered By Accesspress Themes